What Is Structured Literacy?

structured literacy

In today’s post, I introduce you to the concept of Structured Literacy (SL). As explained by Louise Spear-Swerling (2022), SL is a comprehensive approach to reading interventions that caters to children with various reading difficulties. SL covers a broad spectrum of instructional strategies and is designed to support students with diverse reading challenges, not just those with specific types of difficulties.

SL is not limited to phonics instruction. It includes teaching foundational skills like phonemic awareness, phonics, and spelling, as well as advanced literacy skills such as reading comprehension and written expression. This makes SL effective for both decoding problems and comprehension issues (Louise Spear-Swerling, 2022).

In this post, I cover the definition of Structured Literacy, highlighting what SL is and how it supports a wide range of reading challenges. I also delve into the key features of SL, explaining the components and instructional strategies that make it effective. Additionally, I provide sample SL activities that you can implement in your classroom to support your students’ literacy development.

For those of you interested in delving deeper into the features and benefits of Structured Literacy, check out the references and resources at the bottom of the page.

What Is Structured Literacy?

Structured Literacy (SL) is a term used by the International Dyslexia Association to describe a collection of teaching methods and interventions designed to address various literacy challenges. SL focuses on essential literacy skills and components of oral language that are crucial for reading development and often linked to different types of reading difficulties.

Key elements of SL according to Louise Spear-Swerling (2022) include:

  • Phonemic awareness: Understanding and manipulating individual sounds in spoken words.
  • Phonics: Recognizing letter-sound relationships and using this knowledge to read unfamiliar words.
  • Orthography: Understanding common spelling patterns in English.
  • Morphology: Knowing about word parts like roots, prefixes, and suffixes.
  • Syntax: Understanding sentence structure.
  • Semantics: Comprehending meaning at the word, sentence, and text levels.

These components work together to build a strong foundation for reading and addressing literacy difficulties.


Structured Literacy

Structured Literacy Features

The importance of structured literacy is well documented in the literature (e.g., Berninger et al., 2006; Seidenberg, 2017; Spear-Swerling ; Stanovich, 2000))., Structured Literacy (SL) involves a methodical and direct approach to teaching key literacy skills. Here are some of its main features as outlined by Spear-Swerling (2022, p. 4):

  • Systematic Teaching: SL involves the explicit instruction of essential skills. Teachers model and explain these skills clearly, ensuring students understand each step.
  • Attention to Prerequisite Skills: Instruction follows a logical sequence, progressing from simple to more complex skills. For example, teachers first show students how to break down simple words into individual sounds before moving on to more complex tasks like summarization strategies for comprehension.
  • Targeted, Unambiguous, Prompt Feedback: SL takes into account the foundational skills needed for more advanced tasks. Students are taught to spell simple consonant-vowel-consonant words before tackling more complex ones. Feedback is given promptly to correct mistakes and prevent future errors.
  • Planned, Purposeful Choices of Examples, Tasks, and Texts: Teachers select examples, tasks, and texts that align with students’ current skill levels, ensuring they are neither too easy nor too confusing. For instance, when teaching new vocabulary, teachers use definitions that students can understand.
  • Consistent Application of Skills and Teaching for Transfer: Initial phonics and spelling instruction focuses on letter-sound relationships and blending rather than larger units like whole words. Activities are designed to reinforce learned skills and encourage their application to new, increasingly complex tasks.
  • Data-based Decision Making: Instruction is guided by ongoing assessment and data. Teachers adjust their methods based on student progress, ensuring that the tasks chosen help students apply and transfer their skills to different contexts.

Related: Essential Strategies for Teaching Phonemic Awareness

Structured Literacy Activities

There are several Structured Literacy (SL) activities teachers can use in the classroom to support reading development. Below are some practical suggestions highlighted in Mowyer and Johnson (2019)’s paper:

  1. Phonemic Awareness Games: Engage students in activities that help them identify and manipulate sounds in words, such as rhyming games or segmenting words into individual sounds.
  2. Explicit Phonics Instruction: Teach students the relationship between letters and sounds through direct instruction and practice, helping them decode new words accurately.
  3. Vocabulary Building: Use clear, simple definitions and context clues to teach new vocabulary words, enhancing students’ understanding and usage of new terms.
  4. Comprehension Strategies: Model and practice strategies like summarization, asking questions, and making inferences to help students understand and analyze texts.
  5. Reading and Writing Integration: Have students practice writing sentences and paragraphs using their phonics and vocabulary knowledge, reinforcing their reading skills through writing.
  6. Science Texts Engagement: Use popular science articles or adapted primary literature to teach students how to read and understand scientific texts, fostering scientific literacy.

Related: Phonological Awareness Versus Phonemic Awareness

Final thoughts

In this post, I covered the definition of Structured Literacy, its key features, and provided sample activities to help you implement these strategies in your classroom. I hope you have found these insights valuable and that it inspires you to explore and integrate Structured Literacy into your teaching practice. For those of you interested in learning more, make sure to check out the references and resources below.

References

  • Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Jones, J., Wolf, B. J., Gould, L., Anderson-Youngstrom, M., … & Apel, K. (2006). Early development of language by hand: Composing, reading, listening, and speaking connections; three letter-writing modes; and fast mapping in spelling. Developmental neuropsychology29(1), 61-92.
  • Mawyer, K. K. N., & Johnson, H. J. (2019). Eliciting Preservice Teachers’ Reading Strategies Through Structured Literacy Activities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(6), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1589848
  • Spear-Swerling, L. (Ed.). (2022). An introduction to structured literacy and poor-reader Profiles. In L. Spear-Swerling (Ed.), Structured literacy interventions : teaching students with reading difficulties, grades K-6 (pp. 1-22). The Guilford Press.
  • Spear-Swerling, L. (2019). Here’s Why Schools Should Use Structured Literacy. International Dyslexia Association.
  • Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. Guilford Press.

Further Readings

  • Alexander, K. L. (2024). Using Intentional Pairing and Peer Tutoring during Structured Literacy Activities in Inclusion Classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 77(6), 991–996. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2329
  • Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2010). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford Publications.
  • Center, Y., & Freeman, L. (1997). The use of a structured literacy program to facilitate the inclusion of marginal and special education students into regular classes. Australasian Journal of Special Education21(1), 45-62.
  • Fallon, K. A., & Katz, L. A. (2020). Structured Literacy Intervention for Students with Dyslexia: Focus on Growing Morphological Skills. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 51(2), 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-19-00019
  • Haynes, C. W., Smith, S. L., & Laud, L. (2019). Structured Literacy Approaches to Teaching Written Expression. Perspectives on Language and Literacy45(3), 22-28.
  • International Dyslexia Association. (2019) Structured literacy: An introductory guide. Newark,DE
  • Seidenberg, M. (2017). Language at the Speed of Sight: How we Read, Why so Many Can’t, and what can be done about it. Basic Books.
  • Spear-Swerling, L. (Ed.). (2022). Structured literacy interventions : teaching students with reading difficulties, grades K-6. The Guilford Press.
  • Phonemic Awareness Games and Activities, Educators Technology.

The post What Is Structured Literacy? appeared first on Educators Technology.

What Is Frayer Model?

In today’s post, I am covering a very important strategy in teaching vocabulary—the Frayer Model. This graphic organizer has transformed the way educators introduce and explore new words across various subjects and grade levels. More specifically, I delve into the definition of the Frayer Model, outline effective implementation strategies, highlight its numerous benefits, and conclude with practical examples. Whether you’re a seasoned educator or new to teaching, understanding how to leverage this tool can significantly enhance your instructional approach and improve student outcomes in vocabulary development.

What is the Frayer Model?



Frayer model is “an instructional strategy that utilizes a graphic organizer to teach vocabulary” (Dazzeo & Rao, 2020, p. 35). Originally developed by Dorothy Frayer and her colleagues in 1969, this model, as Westby (2024) stated, is versatile, supporting vocabulary learning before reading (to activate prior knowledge), during reading (to monitor reading), and after students engage with a text (to assess comprehension). In this way, Frayer model prepares students with the necessary background knowledge, aids them in recognizing vocabulary usage within context during reading, and allows them to evaluate their understanding post-reading.

Frayer Model features a four-square chart with a central circle where the vocabulary word is placed. Each square surrounding the word is designated for specific content such as the definition, characteristics (distinguishing between essential and non-essential), applications, and visuals like images or drawings (Westby, 2024) .

Additional details such as examples, non-examples, usage in sentences, facts, synonyms, and antonyms can also be included depending on the focus of the lesson. This layout facilitates a comprehensive analysis and clarification of complex words, enhancing students’ vocabulary skills effectively.

Strategies for Effectively Using the Frayer Model in Teaching

Here are some practical tips on how to effectively use the Frayer Model in the classroom, drawing on strategies recommended by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction:

  1. Word Selection: Choose vocabulary words from a specific text passage. This helps ensure the words are relevant and contextualized, aiding deeper understanding.
  2. Clarify Purpose: Clearly define why you are using the Frayer Model. Is it to activate prior knowledge, aid comprehension while reading, or assess understanding after reading?
  3. Model the Process: Demonstrate how to use the Frayer Model. Use a think-aloud technique to show students how you analyze a word:
    • Write the selected word in the center.
    • Describe the characteristics of the word, helping students understand its nuances.
    • List examples and non-examples to clarify what the word is and isn’t, enhancing distinction.
    • Draft a definition in your own words, encouraging students to think beyond textbook definitions.
  1. Scaffold Learning: Provide support as needed during each step of the Frayer Model. This might include guiding students on how to identify characteristics or examples, or assisting them in crafting their own definitions.
  2. Verification: After students complete their part of the model, have them compare their definitions with dictionary definitions. This helps validate their understanding and correct any misconceptions.
  3. Encourage Independent Practice: Once students are familiar with the process, encourage them to use the Frayer Model independently. This can be done in various settings: individually, in pairs, or in small groups.
  4. Monitor Progress: Use methods like teacher observation, conferencing, and student journaling to assess and monitor progress. Employing the Frayer Model as a formative assessment tool can provide insights into students’ vocabulary development and conceptual understanding.
  5. Integration Across Lessons: Incorporate the Frayer Model not just in language classes but across different subjects to help students generalize the vocabulary learning strategy.

Key Benefits of the Frayer Model

The Frayer Model has been shown to be particularly valuable across various educational levels and subjects. Here are some of its key benefits

  1. Improves Comprehension and Retention:
    The Frayer Model encourages students to explore and understand words beyond their simple definitions by engaging them in a multifaceted analysis. This includes characteristics, examples, and visual representations, which aid in better retention and recall. Studies such as those by Dazzeo and Roe (2020) have documented its effectiveness in enhancing vocabulary acquisition and retention, particularly when integrated with graphic organizers.
  2. Supports Diverse Learning Needs:
    This model has been identified as especially beneficial for students with learning disabilities. Research cited by authors like Bos and Anders (1990) and Wanjiru & O’Connor (2015) demonstrates that the visual and structured nature of the Frayer Model can help overcome challenges associated with traditional learning methods. It provides a clear framework that can be adjusted to meet various educational needs.
  3. Enhances Critical Thinking:
    By requiring students to categorize and differentiate between examples and non-examples, the Frayer Model fosters critical thinking skills. It pushes students to analyze how and why certain examples fit (or don’t fit) a particular vocabulary word, which is a higher-order thinking skill that is vital across all areas of education.
  4. Facilitates Active Learning:
    As noted by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, the Frayer Model involves students actively in the learning process. This active participation is crucial for engagement and effective learning. It makes the vocabulary learning process more dynamic and interactive, which can increase student motivation and interest.
  5. Adaptable Across Disciplines:
    This model’s versatility makes it applicable in numerous subject areas, not just language arts. It can be effectively used in science to define concepts like photosynthesis or in social studies to explore historical terms or social concepts, thereby supporting cross-curricular learning strategies.

Related: What Is Turn and Talk Strategy?

Frayer Model Examples

The example below illustrates how photosynthesis can be explored through the Frayer Model, enhancing understanding by distinguishing it from other biological processes and situating it within its ecological and scientific context.

Selected Word:

Photosynthesis

Characteristics:

  • A biological process.
  • Occurs in plants, algae, and some bacteria.
  • Converts light energy into chemical energy.
  • Produces oxygen as a byproduct.

Examples:

  • Green plants creating their own food using sunlight.
  • Algae contributing to oxygen production in aquatic environments.

Non-Examples:

  • Respiration (opposite process in living organisms).
  • Fermentation (anaerobic process in yeast and bacteria).
  • Decomposition (breakdown of organic matter).

Personal Definition:

Photosynthesis is the process by which green plants and some other organisms use sunlight to synthesize nutrients from carbon dioxide and water. It generally involves the green pigment chlorophyll and generates oxygen as a byproduct.

Dictionary Definition Check:

According to Cambridge dictionary, photosynthesis is “the process by which a plant uses carbon dioxide from the air, water from the ground, and the energy from the light of the sun to produce its own food and oxygen.”



Related: What is The Think Pair Share Strategy?

Final thoughts

In this post, I talked about the Frayer Model, providing a detailed definition, outlining practical implementation strategies, discussing its numerous benefits, and illustrating these points with examples. I hope you found this exploration insightful and that it inspires you to incorporate the Frayer Model into your teaching toolkit. By doing so, you can enhance vocabulary learning and comprehension in your classroom. Make sure to check the references for more in-depth information and further studies that underscore the effectiveness of this powerful educational strategy.

References

  • Bos C., Anders P. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2011.11461773
  • Dazzeo, R., & Rao, K. (2020). Digital Frayer Model: Supporting Vocabulary Acquisition With Technology and UDL. Teaching Exceptional Children, 53(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920911951
  • Frayer, D., Frederick, W. C., & Klausmeier, H. J. (1969). A schema for testing the level of cognitive mastery. Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
  • Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, Frayer Model, retrieved from https://dpi.wi.gov/sites/default/files/imce/ela/bank/6-12_L.VAU_Frayer_Model.pdf
  • Westby, C. (2024). Frayer Model for Vocabulary Development. Word of Mouth, 35(3), 13-14. https://doi-org.ezproxy.msvu.ca/10.1177/10483950231211841d
  • Wanjiru B., O-Connor M. (2015). Effects of mathematical vocabulary instruction on students’ achievement in mathematics in secondary schools of Murang’a County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 201–207.

Further readings

  • Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G.,&Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guilford.
  • Graves, M.F. (2006). The vocabulary book: Learning & instruction. New York: Teachers College Press; Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
  • Winters, R. (1991). Vocabulary anchors: Building conceptual connections with young readers. In Reading Teacher, 54(7), 659–662.

The post What Is Frayer Model? appeared first on Educators Technology.

What Is Turn and Talk Strategy?

Today’s post is all about “Turn and Talk,” an engaging and interactive instructional strategy used in classrooms. If you haven’t heard about it or are looking for ways to implement it more effectively, this post is for you.

I will start with a definition of what “Turn and Talk” is all about, explaining its purpose and how it works in a classroom setting. Next, we will discuss practical tips for integrating “Turn and Talk” into your lessons, ensuring you can maximize its benefits. Then, I’ll provide some examples of “Turn and Talk” activities to inspire you and help you get started. Finally, we’ll conclude with insights from research, showcasing the proven benefits of this strategy for student learning and engagement.

What is Turn and Talk?

“Turn and Talk” is an instructional strategy where students pair up to discuss specific topics, questions, or concepts for a set period of time (Stewart & Swanson, 2019). This approach leverages structured peer interactions to enhance understanding, retention, and engagement with the material. Through verbal articulation and reciprocal roles, students reinforce learning concepts, improve vocabulary acquisition, and develop critical social and communication skills.

Practical Tips for Integrating ‘Turn and Talk’ in the Classroom

Here are some practical tips to help you effectively integrate “Turn and Talk” into your classroom activities. These insights, informed by Stewart and Swansson (2019), can enhance student engagement and learning outcomes through structured peer interactions.

  • Monitor and Support: Circulate around the room to monitor discussions, ensuring students stay on task and addressing misconceptions promptly.
  • Debrief and Share: After discussions, bring the class together for a debriefing session. Ask pairs to share their insights to reinforce key concepts and broaden perspectives.
  • Use Sentence Starters: Provide sentence starters like “One important aspect is…” to help students articulate their thoughts and encourage deeper engagement.
  • Establish Clear Expectations: Clearly explain the activity’s expectations and procedures, emphasizing active listening and respectful interaction to create a productive learning environment.
  • Vary the Prompts: Use different types of prompts to keep the activity engaging and address various learning styles, ensuring students remain motivated and interested.
  • Incorporate Visual Aids: Use visual aids to provide context and help visual learners engage more fully with the discussion topic.
  • Set Time Limits: Set clear time limits for each part of the activity to keep discussions focused and manageable within your lesson plan.


Examples of “Turn and Talk” Activities

For inspiration, here are some examples of “Turn and Talk” activities you can use with your students to promote engagement and deepen understanding through peer discussions. These activities are designed to integrate seamlessly into various subjects and encourage collaborative learning.

  1. Literature Discussion:
    After reading a chapter of a book, ask students to turn to a partner and discuss the main character’s motivations and actions. For example, “Why do you think the main character made that decision? How do you think it will affect the story?” Partner 1 shares their thoughts while Partner 2 listens, then they switch roles.
  2. Math Problem Solving:
    Present a challenging math problem on the board. Ask students to turn to their partner and discuss their strategies for solving it. For example, “What steps do you think we should take to solve this problem? Why do you think that approach will work?” Partner 1 explains their strategy while Partner 2 listens, then they swap roles.
  3. Science Concepts:
    After a lesson on ecosystems, have students pair up to explain how energy flows through a food web. For example, “Can you describe the path energy takes from the sun through the food web we studied?” Partner 1 discusses the concept while Partner 2 listens and asks clarifying questions, then they reverse roles.
  4. Historical Events:
    Have students discuss the causes and effects of a significant historical event, such as the signing of the Declaration of Independence. For example, “What were the main reasons the colonies wanted independence? What were the immediate effects after the declaration was signed?” Partner 1 outlines their ideas while Partner 2 listens and then they switch roles to provide their own insights.
  5. Personal Connections:
    Ask students to relate a lesson topic to their own experiences. For instance, after a lesson on teamwork, prompt students with, “Can you share a time when you worked as part of a team? What role did you play, and what was the outcome?” Partner 1 tells their story while Partner 2 listens and then they swap roles to share their own experience.

Importance of Turn and Talk’: Insights from Educational Research

The importance of “Turn and Talk” is well documented in the education literature. According to Jones et al. (2000), integrating mnemonic strategies with collaborative learning activities like “Turn and Talk” allows students to enhance their vocabulary acquisition significantly. By discussing and reinforcing learning concepts in pairs, students not only assimilate content more effectively but also retain it longer, illustrating the profound impact of collaborative learning on educational outcomes.

Further emphasizing the effectiveness of “Turn and Talk,” Vaughn and Martinez (2007) highlight how this strategy significantly improves educational outcomes for English Language Learners (ELLs) through structured, interactive, and discourse-based instruction. Their study shows that both ELLs and non-ELLs benefit from peer interactions within structured settings, which are core to the “Turn and Talk” activity. Through engaging in discussions and processing new information collaboratively, students can enhance their comprehension and mastery of content.

Locke and Fuchs’ study on peer-mediated instruction (PMI) further corroborates the benefits of structured peer interaction, akin to “Turn and Talk,” especially among students with behavioral disorders. Their research demonstrated significant improvements in both on-task behaviors and social interactions, underscoring the importance of reciprocal roles in the learning process. Through PMI, students engage in mutual teaching and learning roles, enhancing academic engagement and fostering a supportive classroom environment.

As the research demonstrates, “Turn and Talk” is a highly effective instructional strategy. Through “Turn and Talk,” students can engage in meaningful discussions, enhance their comprehension, and develop crucial social skills in a supportive classroom environment.

Related: What is The Think Pair Share Strategy?

Final thoughts

In this post, I talked about the “Turn and Talk” instructional strategy, highlighting its importance and effectiveness in the classroom. I covered the definition of “Turn and Talk,” provided practical tips for integrating it into your lessons, and shared several examples of activities to inspire you. Additionally, I discussed insights from research that underscore the benefits of this approach for student learning and engagement. I hope this information helps you effectively implement “Turn and Talk” in your teaching practice. The references below will also provide further reading and evidence to support the use of this valuable strategy.

References

  • Jones, M. S., Levin, M. E., Levin, J. R., & Beitzel, B. D. (2000). Can Vocabulary-Learning Strategies and Pair-Learning Formats Be Profitably Combined? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.256
  • Locke, W. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (1995). Effects of Peer-Mediated Reading Instruction on the On-Task Behavior and Social Interaction of Children with Behavior Disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 3(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342669500300204
  • Stewart, A. A., & Swanson, E. (2019). Turn and talk: An evidence-based practice. Teacher’s guide. Austin, TX: The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk. Retrieved from https://meadowscenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/TurnAndTalk_TeacherGuide1.pdf
  • Vaughn, S., Martinez, L. R., Wanzek, J., Roberts, G., Swanson, E., & Fall, A.-M. (2017). Improving Content Knowledge and Comprehension for English Language Learners: Findings From a Randomized Control Trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000069

The post What Is Turn and Talk Strategy? appeared first on Educators Technology.

What is The Think Pair Share Strategy?

In today’s post, I discuss a key teaching and learning strategy known as Think-Pair-Share (TPS). More specifically, I will cover what recent research says about the effectiveness and use of TPS, delve into the key advantages of using this strategy in classroom teaching, and provide tips to help teachers seamlessly integrate TPS into their daily teaching routines.

To conclude, I’ll showcase practical examples across various subjects to demonstrate how this strategy can be applied effectively in diverse educational settings. Whether you’re a seasoned educator or new to the profession, this post aims to enrich your teaching toolkit with insights and actionable steps for implementing Think-Pair-Share.

For those of you interested in learning more about the research-based underpinnings of the Think-Pair-Share strategy, I invite you to check the references at the bottom of this post. These resources provide deeper insights and further details that can help enrich your understanding and application of this effective teaching method.

What Is The Think Pair Share Strategy?

The Think-Pair-Share strategy is a popular collaborative learning method, which was introduced by Professor Frank Lyman at the University of Maryland in 1981 (Kaddoura, 2013). This technique unfolds in three key stages:

  1. Think: In this initial phase, students are presented with a question, prompt, or observation by the teacher. They are given a few minutes to quietly reflect on the topic and formulate their own thoughts and responses independently.
  2. Pair: Next, students team up with a partner or a nearby classmate to discuss their individual thoughts. This stage allows them to exchange ideas, compare notes, and decide together which responses are the strongest, most persuasive, or most unique.
  3. Share: Finally, pairs are invited to share their insights with the entire class. This sharing can take the form of presenting their agreed-upon answers or simply discussing the variety of ideas that emerged during their pair discussions.

Think Pair Share

Think-Pair-Share: Insights from Recent Research

Research on the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) strategy continues to validate its effectiveness and adaptability in educational settings. According to Kaddoura (2007), TPS significantly enhances critical thinking (CT) skills along with analytical abilities like argumentation, prioritization, problem-solving, and resolution.

This aligns with earlier findings by authors like Robertson (2006) and Ledlow (2001), who advocate for TPS as an active and engaging pedagogical tool that facilitates deeper learning through cooperative interaction. These studies suggest that the structured phases of TPS encourage comprehensive thinking and interaction, which are essential for developing higher-level cognitive skills.

However, the research by Copper et al. (2021) introduces a critical examination of the ‘share’ component of TPS, revealing potential drawbacks such as inequities in student participation and heightened anxiety among students when sharing in front of large groups. Their findings underscore the necessity to reassess this phase, suggesting modifications or even elimination in certain contexts to better serve all students’ needs and minimize classroom anxieties. This perspective is crucial as it highlights the evolving understanding of how traditional methods need adaptation to ensure inclusivity and effectiveness in diverse educational settings.

While fundamentally robust, the strategy’s application and execution may require careful consideration and adjustment to address the unique challenges of contemporary classrooms. This ongoing dialogue between embracing proven methods and adapting to new educational landscapes ensures that teaching strategies like TPS remain relevant and effective in fostering not just academic skills but also a supportive and equitable learning environment.

Related: What is Andragogy?

Key Advantages of Think-Pair-Share in Classroom Teaching

Here is a short summary of the main advantages of the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) strategy, as backed by research. These benefits illustrate how TPS can effectively enhance both individual and collaborative learning experiences in educational settings:

  • Enhances Critical Thinking: TPS encourages students to think critically about problems or questions, fostering deeper understanding (Kaddoura, 2007).
  • Improves Analytical Skills: Helps develop skills in analysis, argumentation, prioritization, problem-solving, and resolution (Kaddoura, 2007).
  • Promotes Active Learning: Engages students actively in their learning process, making the classroom environment more dynamic and interactive (Robertson, 2006; Ledlow, 2001).
  • Facilitates Peer Learning: Encourages students to discuss and share ideas with peers, enhancing collaborative learning (Robertson, 2006).
  • Supports Equitable Participation: Provides a structured format for all students to contribute, potentially reducing barriers to participation (Copper et al., 2021).
  • Reduces Anxiety: By sharing in pairs before addressing the whole class, students may feel less anxious and more confident in presenting their ideas (Copper et al., 2021).
  • Adaptable to Various Contexts: Can be modified to fit different classroom sizes and settings, ensuring its effectiveness across diverse learning environments (Copper et al., 2021).

Think Pair Share

Tips for Implementing Think-Pair-Share in the Classroom

Integrating the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) strategy into classroom teaching can significantly enhance student engagement and learning. Here are a few practical tips, according to Read Write Think, to help teachers effectively apply this strategy:

  1. Set Clear Objectives: Before implementing TPS, clearly define what you aim to achieve with the lesson. Whether it’s introducing a new concept or reviewing existing knowledge, having a specific target helps in structuring the TPS session effectively.
  2. Explain the Strategy: Describe the TPS process to students and explain its purpose. This helps students understand why they are participating in the activity and what is expected of them.
  3. Model the Process: Demonstrate the TPS steps with the help of a student or a group of students. This modeling shows students exactly how to engage in each phase of the strategy.
  4. Guide the ‘Think’ Stage: Pose a thought-provoking question or problem related to the lesson and give students a few minutes to think independently. This stage is crucial for students to formulate their own ideas.
  5. Facilitate Effective Pairing: Pair students thoughtfully, considering their reading and language skills, attention span, and interpersonal dynamics. You can choose to assign pairs or allow students to select their partners, depending on the objectives and nature of the activity.
  6. Monitor and Support: While students are discussing in pairs, circulate around the room to listen in and provide guidance where necessary. This not only helps in assessing their understanding but also in addressing any misconceptions immediately.
  7. Encourage Inclusive Sharing: Transition from pair discussions to a whole-class sharing session. Ensure that each pair has an opportunity to share their ideas with the class. This can broaden the discussion and incorporate multiple perspectives.
  8. Reflect and Reassess: After the sharing phase, encourage pairs to reconvene and discuss how their views might have changed based on the class discussion. This reflection helps deepen their understanding and appreciation of different viewpoints.

Think Pair Share

Think Pair Share Activities

In this section, I provide some practical examples to demonstrate how teachers can effectively incorporate the Think-Pair-Share strategy across various subjects. These examples illustrate the versatility of this method in fostering critical thinking and collaborative learning, enhancing student engagement and understanding in diverse educational contexts.

1. Social Studies:

Example: When discussing civil rights movements, ask students to think about why these movements emerged when they did. Students then pair up to discuss the socio-political factors of the time and share their conclusions with the class.

2. Language Learning:

Example: For a foreign language class, present a colloquial phrase or idiom. Have students think about possible meanings individually, then pair up to discuss and finally share their interpretations and correct usage with the class.

3. Math

Example: Introduce a new algebraic concept like quadratic equations. Students first solve a related problem individually, discuss their solving strategies with a partner, and share their approaches and solutions with the class.

4. Science

Example: In a biology lesson on ecosystems, ask students to think about the role of decomposers. Pairs discuss how ecosystems might change without decomposers and share their ideas during a class discussion.

5. Reading

Example: After reading a chapter of a novel, ask students to think about the motivations of a key character. They discuss their thoughts with a peer and share their interpretations with the class, enhancing understanding through collective insight.

Final thoughts

In this post, I talked about the Think-Pair-Share strategy, a powerful tool in the arsenal of educational techniques that promotes active learning and collaborative thinking. I also delved into the research supporting this method, outlined its key benefits, offered practical tips for integration, and provided specific examples of how it can be applied across different subjects. I hope you found this discussion enlightening and that it inspires you to incorporate Think-Pair-Share into your teaching practice.

Related: What is Total Physical Response?

References

  • Cooper, K. M., Schinske, J. N., & Tanner, K. D. (2021). Reconsidering the Share of a Think-Pair-Share: Emerging Limitations, Alternatives, and Opportunities for Research. CBE life sciences education20(1), fe1. https://doi-org.ezproxy.msvu.ca/10.1187/cbe.20-08-0200
  • Guenther, A. R., & Abbott, C. M. (2024). Think-Pair-Share: Promoting Equitable Participation and In-Depth Discussion. PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)8, 7. https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2024.444143
  • Mundelsee, P., & Jurkowski, S. (2021). Learning and Individual Differences. Think and pair before share: Effects of collaboration on students’ in-class participation, 88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102015
  • Kaddoura, M. (2013). Think Pair Share: A teaching Learning Strategy to Enhance Students’ Critical Thinking. Educational Research Quarterly, 36(4), 3. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1061947

Further Readings

  • Gilles, R.M. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students’ behaviors, discourse and learning during a science-based learning activity. School
    Psychology International, 29(3), 328-347
  • Ledlow, S. (2001). Using Think-Pair-Share in the college classroom. Center for Learning and Teaching Excellence, Arizona State University.
  • Lyman, F. T. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion: The inclusion of all students. Mainstreaming Digest109, 113.
  • Marzano, R.J. & Pickering, D.J. (2005). Building academic vocabulary. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Deve
  • Nagel. P. (2008). Moving beyond lecture: Cooperative learning and the secondary social studies classroom. Education Chula Vista, 128,(3), 363-368,
  • Tanner, K. D. (2009). Talking to learn: Why biology students should be talking in classrooms and how to make it happen. CBE—Life Sciences Education8(2), 89–94.

The post What is The Think Pair Share Strategy? appeared first on Educators Technology.

What is Andragogy?

What is Andragogy

Understanding adult learners is crucial for creating educational environments that effectively address their unique needs. Malcolm Knowles, a pioneer in the study of adult learning, articulated six core principles of andragogy that have fundamentally shaped how we approach education for adults. These principles emphasize the importance of tailoring educational experiences to the characteristics and expectations of adult learners, who differ significantly from younger students in motivation, experience, and goals.

This post delves into each of Knowles’ principles, exploring how they can be implemented in various educational settings to enhance learning outcomes for adults. From recognizing the intrinsic motivation and self-direction that adults bring to their learning, to valuing their life experiences and focusing on practical and relevant learning opportunities, these principles serve as a guide for educators and trainers. By understanding and applying these principles, educators can create more engaging, effective, and respectful learning environments for adult learners.

What is Andragogy?

Malcolm Knowles’ concept of andragogy represents a foundational shift in the way educators approach the learning processes of adults. Knowles described andragogy as “the art and science of helping adults learn,” a definition that underscores the dual nature of this approach—both creative and systematic—tailored specifically to adult learners. This contrasts sharply with pedagogy, which is traditionally associated with the more directive, often teacher-centered education of children.

The distinction between andragogy and pedagogy is crucial because it recognizes that adults and children learn in fundamentally different ways. Adults bring a wealth of life experiences to their learning processes, have established values and beliefs, and are typically more self-directed in their educational pursuits. Therefore, andragogy focuses on facilitating rather than dictating learning, leveraging the intrinsic motivation and accumulated knowledge that adults bring to the table.

This approach encourages a collaborative and reciprocal relationship between the educator and the learner, where learning is seen as a shared journey of discovery rather than a one-way transmission of knowledge. It involves engaging adults in the learning process by recognizing their existing knowledge base and structuring learning experiences that are relevant to their immediate personal and professional contexts. This method not only respects but also utilizes the capabilities and experience of adult learners, making their education a more meaningful and effective process.

Principles of Andragogy

Knowles identified various core principles that are foundational to adult learning. These include:

1. Internal Motivation and Self-direction

Adults typically enter learning scenarios with a greater sense of autonomy and purpose compared to younger learners. This intrinsic motivation is crucial as it drives them to seek out learning opportunities that align with their personal and professional goals. Educators can support this self-directed approach by providing resources and options that allow learners to navigate their educational paths.

For instance, offering a range of modules or elective courses that adults can choose based on their interests or career needs can enhance engagement and motivation. Moreover, adult learners appreciate when they can control the pace and timing of their learning, which can be facilitated through flexible scheduling and self-paced online courses. This autonomy not only reinforces their intrinsic motivation but also deepens their commitment to the learning process.

2. Life Experiences and Knowledge

Adults often have extensive life experiences that enrich their learning, providing a unique perspective that they bring into the educational environment. These experiences can be a valuable resource in the learning process, as adults relate new knowledge to what they already know and have seen.

Educators can leverage this by incorporating experiential learning activities that connect new concepts to familiar real-world situations. Methods such as case studies, role-playing, and simulation exercises are particularly effective as they allow adults to apply theoretical knowledge in a practical context, making learning more dynamic and meaningful. Encouraging adults to share their experiences and insights also fosters a richer learning environment where peers learn from each other’s diverse backgrounds.

3. Goal Orientation

Adult learners are typically very goal-oriented, often pursuing education with specific objectives in mind. These goals might include career progression, skills enhancement, or personal development. Recognizing and aligning educational activities with these goals can significantly enhance the relevance and value of the learning experience for adults.

Educators should endeavor to understand the individual goals of adult learners and, where possible, tailor the curriculum to meet these objectives. This could involve integrating professional development skills, offering credentialing pathways, or providing practical assignments that directly relate to real-world applications.

Regular feedback that helps learners see their progress towards these goals can also motivate adults to continue their education and engage more deeply with the learning material.


What is Andragogy

4. Relevancy Oriented

Adults often prioritize learning that they perceive as relevant to their personal or professional lives. This preference for relevant learning stems from a desire to apply new knowledge and skills in practical ways that enhance their effectiveness in various roles they occupy.

To cater to this need, educators can design curricula that directly tie in with real-world applications. For example, integrating current industry trends, tools, and techniques in course materials ensures that learning is immediately applicable to a learner’s job or personal projects.

Additionally, adult education programs can offer specialized courses that target specific skills or knowledge areas relevant to particular careers or hobbies. This focus on relevancy not only keeps adult learners engaged but also enhances the perceived value of the educational offering, encouraging continued participation and investment in learning.

5. Practicality

Adult learners generally appreciate a practical approach to education, focusing on acquiring skills and knowledge that they can immediately implement. This pragmatic approach to learning helps adults see the tangible benefits of their educational investments swiftly, which in turn, motivates them to continue learning.

Educational programs for adults should, therefore, emphasize hands-on learning opportunities, such as workshops, labs, and real-world projects, where learners can practice new skills and directly see the impact of what they are learning.

Moreover, integrating technology that adults might use in their professional or personal lives can make learning more efficient and directly applicable. Providing resources that can be used on the job or in other practical contexts immediately after learning also underscores the utility of the educational experience.

6. Respect

Respect in adult education encompasses acknowledging the wealth of experiences adult learners bring to the table and recognizing them as equals in the learning process. This respect is manifested through practices such as collaborative learning environments, where instructors and students share insights and learn from each other, and through methodologies that acknowledge adult learners’ self-direction and life experiences.

Educators can foster a respectful environment by facilitating discussions that value each learner’s viewpoint, encouraging peer learning and feedback, and avoiding any presumption that learners are blank slates without valuable knowledge or skills.

Moreover, involving adult learners in the planning and evaluation of their learning activities can reinforce respect and provide them with a sense of ownership over their educational journeys. This democratic approach not only enriches the learning experience but also builds a community of learners who feel valued and respected, leading to increased satisfaction and better educational outcomes.

For those interested in diving deeper into the theoretical underpinnings and practical applications of these principles, Malcolm Knowles’ own work, “The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy,” is an invaluable resource. This research paper offers a comprehensive overview of the evolution of adult learning theory from its early focus on pedagogy to the more tailored approaches of andragogy.

Andragogy Teaching Styles

Here’s a quick overview of the teaching strategies informed by the principles of the andragogical framework:

  1. Case Studies: Utilizing case studies is a prevalent andragogical method that involves presenting real-life scenarios relevant to the topics being taught. This method helps learners analyze complex situations, apply theoretical knowledge, and develop problem-solving skills. Case studies encourage adults to think critically and make decisions based on a blend of their professional experiences and the new insights gained through discussion and analysis.
  2. Role-Playing: Role-playing exercises allow adult learners to experience real-world applications of concepts in a simulated environment. This method is particularly effective in fields such as management training, customer service, and therapeutic settings, where interpersonal skills and conflict resolution are crucial. By acting out scenarios, learners can explore different outcomes and develop a practical understanding of the subject matter in a controlled, risk-free setting.
  3. Simulations: Simulations are an extension of role-playing, often using technology to enhance the learning experience. These might include virtual reality (VR) scenarios, computer-based simulations, or interactive modules that mimic workplace or real-life situations. Simulations are effective in andragogy because they provide a dynamic platform for adults to engage in complex decision-making and strategic thinking without the real-world consequences.
  4. Self-Evaluation: Encouraging self-evaluation is a key aspect of andragogical teaching. This process helps learners assess their understanding and mastery of a topic and fosters a reflective learning practice. Techniques can include reflective journals, self-assessment quizzes, and peer review sessions. Self-evaluation respects the adult learner’s capacity for self-direction and reinforces the personal responsibility they hold for their learning progress.

These teaching styles are underpinned by the core principles of andragogy that recognize adults as autonomous and self-motivated learners who bring valuable experiences to the educational environment. Educators employing andragogical methods focus on facilitating an educational experience that acknowledges these qualities, ensuring that learning is both meaningful and effective.

Final thoughts

I hope this post has provided valuable insights into the distinct and dynamic field of adult learning. Understanding the principles of Andragogy, as articulated by Malcolm Knowles, offers a powerful framework for creating effective adult education programs that respect and leverage the unique characteristics of adult learners. These principles—Internal Motivation and Self-direction, Life Experiences and Knowledge, Goal Orientation, Relevancy, Practicality, and Respect—are not just theoretical concepts; they are practical tools that can significantly enhance the learning experience for adults.

Further Readings

For those eager to delve deeper into the fascinating realm of andragogy, here are some interesting resources to check out. These readings offer valuable insights and perspectives on adult learning theory, shedding light on the evolution, applications, and implications of Malcolm Knowles’ groundbreaking work. From seminal papers like Knowles’ own “The Modern Practice of Adult Education: Andragogy Versus Pedagogy” to contemporary analyses such as Forrest and Peterson’s “It’s Called Andragogy” in the Academy of Management Learning & Education, each resource contributes to a richer understanding of how adults learn and how educators can effectively facilitate their learning journeys.

  • Baker, J. F., Knowles, M. S., Knox, A. B., Weeks, R. W., Childress, J. R., & McElaney, F. A. (1965). CONTINUING EDUCATION. The Journal of Education, 147(3), 1–81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42772717
  • Christa Bass. (2012). Learning Theories & Their Application to Science Instruction for Adults. The American Biology Teacher, 74(6), 387–390. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2012.74.6.6
  • Forrest, S. P., & Peterson, T. O. (2006). It’s Called Andragogy. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(1), 113–122. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40212539
  • Newton, E. S. (1977). Andragogy: Understanding the Adult as a Learner. Journal of Reading, 20(5), 361–363. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40032981
  • Knowles, M. S. (Malcolm S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education : andragogy versus pedagogy. Association Press.
  • Knowles, M. S. (Malcolm S. (1984). Andragogy in action : [applying modern principles of adult learning] (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  • Knowles, M. S. (1962). The Role of Adult Education in the Public Schools. The Journal of Education, 144(4), 1–36. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42748602
  • KNOWLES, M. S. (1972). Innovations in Teaching Styles and Approaches Based Upon Adult Learning. Journal of Education for Social Work, 8(2), 32–39. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23038299
  • Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (Laura L. (2014). Adult learning : linking theory and practice. Jossey-Bass.
  • Romiszowski, A. J. (2011). Andragogy Revisited: A Critical and Multicultural Perspective. Educational Technology, 51(3), 60–62. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44430014
  • Uszler, M. (1990). Andragogy? American Music Teacher, 39(6), 12–15. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43544340
  • Weingand, D. E. (1996). Continuing Education: A Reminder about Andragogy. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 37(1), 79–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/40324288
  • Zmeyov, S. I. (1998). Andragogy: Origins, Developments and Trends. International Review of Education / Internationale Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft / Revue Internationale de l’Education, 44(1), 103–108. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3445079

The post What is Andragogy? appeared first on Educators Technology.

What is Total Physical Response?

Total Physical Response

During my doctoral studies, I had the unique opportunity to delve into a variety of teaching methods, some of which blossomed into prominence in the latter half of the last century and astonishingly retain their relevance today. Among these, one method stood out and became the focus of our discussion today: Total Physical Response (TPR).

Developed by James Asher, TPR is especially helpful in language teaching and learning contexts. This method distinguishes itself by integrating physical movement with language instruction, grounded in the theory that memory is notably enhanced through association with physical actions.

In this post, we will talk about what TPR is all about, how it works, and some of its examples in class. In doing so, I will be referencing Asher’s seminal research throughout, inviting you to read his original work and further deepen your understanding of this amazing instructional method.

Related: 30 Innovative Instructional Strategies Examples

What is Total Physical Response?

Total Physical Response (TPR) is a language teaching method developed by James Asher during the 50s and 60s (e.g., see 1965, 1967, 1969) . TPR is primarily kinesthetic as it integrates physical movement with language instruction. TPR is also based on the theory that memory is enhanced through association with physical actions.

The strategy of the total physical response is to have the students listen to a command in a foreign language and immediately obey with a physical action.

(Asher, 1969, p. 4)

In practice, TPR might involve a teacher commanding the class to “Stand up” or “Open the book” in the target language, and students immediately carry out the action. This direct association between words and actions helps cement the language in the learner’s mind, making it easier to recall and use spontaneously.

This approach aims to mimic the natural language acquisition process, focusing primarily on understanding and immediate physical response to verbal cues, before moving on to speaking. TPR is especially effective in the early stages of language learning, facilitating rapid comprehension and making the learning process more engaging and interactive.

How Was TPR Developed?

The story behind TPR is quite fascinating. James Asher, the brain behind TPR, pointed out a critical issue that many of us in the educational field might find relatable even today: American students, as he observed, were significantly underperforming in foreign language acquisition.

Asher (1969) attributed this underperformance to the fact that US schools at the time allotted only an hour a day to language learning which is, according to Asher, grossly insufficient for developing fluency across the essential language skills: speaking, listening, writing, and reading.

With that being the case, Asher proposed focusing intensely on developing one key language skill at the early stages of learning, which could, in turn, facilitate the development of the other three skills. His choice? Listening comprehension. The rationale is compelling: First, there is the fact that children learn their first language through listening and responding to the physical environment around them, long before they start speaking, reading, or writing.

For example, young children in America acquire a high level of listening fluency for English before they make English utterances. This listening fluency can be demonstrated by observing the complexity of commands which the young child can obey before he learns to speak; and even as speaking develops, listening comprehension is always further advanced.

(Asher, 1969, p. 4)

Second, proficiency in listening has a high positive transfer effect, particularly to speaking, and depending on the language’s phonology and orthography, to reading and writing as well. As Asher confirmed:


There is evidence that the skill of listening comprehension has high positive transfer especially to speaking a foreign language. And, listening skill seems to have a large positive transfer to reading and writing depending upon the fit between phonology and orthography of a specific language.

(asher, 1969, p. 4)


The genius of TPR lies in its simplicity and directness. Instead of overwhelming students with multiple tasks, it involves them in physical action in response to commands in the target language. This method makes the learning process more engaging and less daunting for beginners.


What is Total Physical Response

How Does Total Physical Response Work?

James Asher’s research study (1969) with students learning Russian provides a concrete example of how TPR is implemented in practice and showcases its effectiveness. In this study, the procedure was straightforward but meticulously planned. Participants were positioned on either side of the experimenter (‘E’). The experiment involved listening to commands in Russian from a taped voice and then physically executing these commands along with the experimenter, who acted as a model.

The commands started simple, with one-word directives like “Stand!” and progressively became more complex, eventually evolving into commands requiring a series of actions, such as “Pick up the paper and pencil and put them on the chair.” This gradual increase in complexity allowed students to build on their understanding and fluency in a stepwise manner.

The training was divided into four units, each varying in duration from 1.5 to 7.5 minutes and spaced out over four days. This structured approach ensured that students had time to absorb and practice the new language in manageable segments. Retention tests were conducted after each training session and at various intervals post-training to assess how well students retained the language.

Asher’s study demonstrated the effectiveness of TPR in foreign language learning by showing that students could successfully interpret and act on commands in a new language, even when those commands were complex or novel. This underscores the potential of TPR as a powerful tool in language teaching, capable of facilitating rapid comprehension and long-term retention of the language. The methodology aligns with the naturalistic way humans learn languages, making it not only effective but also engaging for learners.

Total Physical Response Examples and Activities

Here are more examples of TPR activities that teachers can incorporate into their teaching practice. These activities not only make learning more interactive but also help in reinforcing new vocabulary and phrases through physical movement:

  1. Classroom Commands: Start with basic commands that can be used around the classroom like “Sit down”, “Stand up”, “Open your book”, “Close your door”, “Raise your hand”, and “Turn the page”. This not only teaches students commands but also helps in managing the classroom in the target language.
  2. Simon Says: A classic game that can be adapted for language learning. The teacher gives commands like “Simon says touch your nose” or “Simon says jump”. Students only follow the command if it starts with “Simon says”. This game can be used to teach body parts, action verbs, and can be made more complex for advanced learners.
  3. Weather Commands: Teach weather vocabulary by associating actions with different weather conditions. For example, “When it’s sunny, put on sunglasses”, “When it’s raining, open the umbrella”, “When it’s snowing, shiver”, or “When it’s windy, hold your hat”. This can be a fun way to learn weather-related vocabulary.
  4. Daily Routines: Describe daily routines and have students act them out. Use phrases like “Wake up”, “Brush your teeth”, “Eat breakfast”, “Go to school”, “Study”, “Eat dinner”, “Watch TV”, and “Go to bed”. This helps students learn phrases associated with daily activities.
  5. Obstacle Course: Set up a simple obstacle course in the classroom or outdoors. Give instructions like “Jump over the rope”, “Crawl under the table”, “Walk around the chair”, and “Climb over the box”. This activity is great for teaching prepositions and action verbs.
  6. Shopping Spree: Simulate a shopping experience where students have to pick up items based on your commands. “Pick up the apples”, “Put the bread in the basket”, “Pay for the groceries”. This can be a fun way to learn names of food items and shopping-related phrases.
  7. Zoo Visit: Pretend to take a trip to the zoo and see different animals. Use commands like “Walk to the lions”, “Look at the monkeys”, “Feed the ducks”, and “Take pictures of the elephants”. This helps in teaching animal names and actions.
  8. Sports Day: Use sports and activities as a way to teach verbs and nouns. Commands like “Kick the ball”, “Catch the frisbee”, “Swim in the pool”, “Ride the bicycle”, and “Run to the finish line” can make the learning process dynamic and physically engaging.

Related: 4 Highly Effective Instructional Strategies

Final thoughts

In conclusion, Total Physical Response (TPR) is an effective language teaching method that is especially helpful in the early stages of language learning. James Asher’s innovative approach, conceived in response to the challenges of language learning in the mid-20th century, continues to resonate with educators and learners alike, transcending decades with its simplicity and effectiveness.

The essence of TPR—prompting students to respond physically to verbal commands—encapsulates a powerful pedagogical tool that leverages the innate human capacity for kinesthetic learning. This method does more than facilitate language acquisition; it revitalizes the classroom, making learning an active, engaging, and holistic experience

References

  • Asher, James J., “The Total Physical Response Approach to Second Language Learning,” Modern Language Journal 53.1 (1965), 3-4.
  • Asher, J. J., & Price, B. S. (1967). The Learning Strategy of the Total Physical Response: Some Age Differences. Child Development, 38(4), 1219–1227. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127119
  • Asher, J. J. (1969). The Total Physical Response Approach to Second Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 53(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/322091

Further Readings

  • Davidheiser, J. (2002). Teaching German with TPRS (Total Physical Response Storytelling). Die Unterrichtspraxis / Teaching German, 35(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/3531952
  • Pattison, P. (1987). Developing communication skills: A practical handbook for language teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Taylor, H. M. (1981). Learning to listen to English. TESOL Quarterly, 15(1), 41-50
  • Ur, P. (1990). Teaching listening comprehension. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wolvin, A., & Coakley, C. (1982). Listening (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Brown.
  • Wolff, F.I., Marsnik, N.C., Tacey, W.S., & Nichols, R.G. (1983). Perceptive listening. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

The post What is Total Physical Response? appeared first on Educators Technology.

What Is Universal Design for Learning ?

What Is Universal Design for Learning ?

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) draws its inspiration from the broader concept of Universal Design (UD), initially pioneered in architecture. UD aims for inclusive access to architectural spaces for all users.

As Higbee and Goff (2008) suggest, UD emphasizes accommodating the needs of a diverse user base in the creation of spaces, products, or programs. Architectural examples embodying UD principles include features like curb cuts benefiting various users (e.g., individuals on skateboards or parents with strollers), as well as automatic doors, elevators, and lever-style door handles (Higbee & Goff, 2008).

These principles of Universal Design have transitioned into the educational sphere through various models, such as Universal Design for Learning (UDL; Rose & Meyer, 2000), Universal Design for Instruction (UDI; Scott et al., 2003), and Universal Instructional Design (UID; Silver et al., 1998). According to Higbee and Goff (2008), these models are interrelated and complement each other.

Our focus in this post is on Universal Design for Learning, popularly known by the acronym UDL. My purpose behind this post is to introduce you to UDL, explain what it is and talk about the different ways you can use it in your classroom to enhance your teaching and boost students learning. To learn more about UDL, I encourage you to dig deeper into references at the bottom of the post.

What is Universal Design for Learning ?

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a multifaceted framework that can be understood through various insightful definitions provided by different experts in the field. Each definition offers a unique perspective on UDL’s purpose, application, and impact in educational environments.

To start with, Courey et al. (2013) define UDL as “a set of principles and techniques for use in the classroom along with the design of accessible instructional materials.” This definition highlights UDL’s practical application, focusing on its role in shaping classroom practices and creating materials that are accessible to a diverse range of learners. It underscores the importance of UDL in addressing the individual needs and preferences of students, ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to learn effectively.

Expanding on this, Evans et al. (2010) describe UDL as “a framework that helps teachers match research-based instructional methods with students’ specific strengths and challenges” (p. 42). This perspective emphasizes the adaptability of UDL, highlighting its role in enabling educators to tailor their teaching strategies to the unique learning profiles of their students. UDL, in this context, becomes a tool for personalizing education, ensuring that teaching methods are not only grounded in solid research but are also responsive to individual student needs.

Gargiulo, R. M., & Metcalf, D. J. (2023) provide a broader view of UDL, defining it as “an instructional framework, a vehicle for diversifying instruction in order to deliver the general education curriculum to each pupil” (p. 11). They stress that UDL is about removing barriers to access rather than reducing academic challenges, emphasizing its role in promoting flexible, equitable, and accessible teaching methods. This perspective paints UDL as a means to democratize education, ensuring equitable access to learning for all students, including those with disabilities.

Further elaborating on the flexibility and opportunities UDL offers, Evans (2010) notes that it provides “flexibility and opportunity for teachers and students by incorporating collaborative partnerships, technology tools, and differentiated instruction” (p. 42). This definition brings to light the dynamic nature of UDL, illustrating how it fosters a collaborative learning environment enriched with technology and varied instructional methods. It’s an approach that benefits both teachers and students, catering to diverse learning styles and enhancing the overall educational experience.

Lastly, the term ‘universal’ in Universal Design for Learning does not “imply that ‘one size fits all’”, as Higbee and Goff (2008, p. 1) state; it rather signifies the framework’s commitment to universal access. This concept is crucial as it delineates UDL’s focus on inclusivity and accessibility, ensuring that education is tailored to meet the diverse needs of all learners, rather than adopting a ‘one size fits all’ approach.

As Evans et al. (2010) explain, the UDL framework is deeply intertwined with our understanding of brain functionality, recognizing the importance of three primary networks: recognition, affect, and strategic. These networks are essential for processing, integrating, and applying information, and each aligns with a key component of UDL: diverse methods of representation, varied means of engagement, and multiple ways of expression. This alignment underscores UDL’s comprehensive approach to creating adaptable and inclusive learning environments.

Principles of UDL

The Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework, as developed by the Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST; Rose & Meyer, 2000), is centered around three core principles: Representation, Engagement, and Action and Expression. Evans et al (2010) noted that each of these principles is aligned with a particulalr brain functionality or network. different brain networks.

Drawing on insights from CAST and Evans et al. research, the following is a quick overview of each of the UDL principles:

  1. Multiple Means of Representation (Recognition Network)
    This principle is associated with the brain’s recognition network and focuses on the “what” of learning. It emphasizes the importance of presenting information in various formats to accommodate different learning styles and preferences. Teachers leverage this principle by integrating key facts, ideas, and concepts into their teaching and aligning them with students’ prior knowledge and experiences. The goal is to present content in ways that resonate with each student’s strengths, thereby enhancing their connection with new information.
  2. Multiple Means of Engagement (Affect Network)
    The second principle, which relates to the “why” of learning, involves the brain’s affect network. This aspect of UDL addresses student motivation and interest, aiming to make learning experiences more relevant and engaging. Teachers engage students by linking lessons to real-life scenarios, sparking their interests, and encouraging social interaction and collaboration. This principle also considers individual social preferences and emotional connections to the learning material, recognizing the importance of emotional engagement in the learning process.
  3. Multiple Means of Expression (Strategic Network)
    The third component focuses on the “how” of learning, involving the brain’s strategic network. This principle acknowledges the diversity in how students process information and express what they have learned. It advocates for offering various ways for students to demonstrate their understanding and mastery of a subject. This approach allows for a range of expression methods, catering to different abilities and preferences, and provides students with choices in how they communicate their learning, thereby fostering a more inclusive learning environment.

The integration of UDL principles into educational practice requires a proactive approach. As Gargiulo and Metcalf (2023, p. 11) emphasize, these UDL principles should be “built into instructional design rather than added on later as an afterthought.” This proactive integration ensures that educational content and methods are inherently inclusive and effective from the outset, addressing the diverse needs of all learners in a holistic and thoughtful manner.

Key Benefits of Universal Design for Learning

Here are some of the key benefits of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) I synthesized from the various sources cited in this post:

  • Facilitates Inclusive Education: UDL ensures that learning environments cater to the needs of all students, including those with disabilities, thereby promoting inclusivity.
  • Addresses Diverse Learning Styles: By providing multiple means of representation, UDL accommodates different learning styles, helping students to better understand and engage with the content.
  • Enhances Student Engagement: UDL’s emphasis on diverse means of engagement keeps students motivated and interested in the learning process.
  • Improves Accessibility: Through varied teaching methods and materials, UDL makes education more accessible to students with varying abilities and backgrounds.
  • Supports Personalized Learning: UDL allows for personalized instruction that meets individual student needs, enhancing learning outcomes.
  • Encourages Flexible Teaching Approaches: It prompts educators to think creatively about how they teach, encouraging innovative and adaptive teaching strategies.
  • Promotes Higher Order Thinking Skills: By offering multiple means of expression, UDL encourages students to demonstrate their understanding in different ways, fostering critical thinking and creativity.
  • Builds a Collaborative Learning Environment: UDL’s principles foster collaboration and peer learning, enhancing the social aspect of education.
  • Reduces Barriers to Learning: UDL proactively identifies and minimizes barriers within the education system, making learning more accessible and effective for everyone.
  • Prepares Students for Real-World Challenges: By linking learning to real-life scenarios, UDL prepares students for practical, real-world challenges, enhancing their readiness for life beyond school.
  • Enhances Teacher Effectiveness: UDL equips teachers with a toolkit to meet diverse learning needs, making their teaching more effective and responsive.
  • Supports Educational Equity: UDL contributes to educational equity by ensuring that all students, regardless of their abilities or backgrounds, have equal opportunities to learn and succeed.

How to Integrate UDL in Teaching?

UDL is being used in various content areas including lesson planning (Courey et al, 2013; Van Laarhoven et al., 2007), mathematics (Kortering, McClannon, & Braziel, 2008), science (Dymond et al.,2006; Kurtts, Matthews, & Smallwood, 2009), and reading (Meo, 2008).

The key to an effective implementation of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in the classroom involves incorporating strategies that address its three core principles: multiple means of representation, engagement, and action and expression.

Here are some practical examples for each principle:

1. Multiple Means of Representation

  • Use of Diverse Teaching Materials: Incorporate a mix of texts, videos, diagrams, and audio recordings to present information. This variety caters to different learning styles, such as visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learners.
  • Interactive Learning Tools: Utilize interactive whiteboards, online simulations, or educational apps to make abstract concepts more tangible and engaging.
  • Customized Reading Materials: Provide reading materials at varying levels of difficulty or complexity to suit different reading abilities. Offer options like audiobooks or e-books with adjustable text size and background color for accessibility.

2. Multiple Means of Engagement

  • Real-World Connections: Link lessons to real-world scenarios or current events to make learning more relevant and engaging. For instance, use a local environmental issue to teach about ecosystems in science class.
  • Choice-Based Assignments: Allow students to choose from a range of assignment topics or formats, enabling them to engage with content that interests them or in a manner they find most compelling.
  • Collaborative Learning: Organize group activities or projects that encourage peer interaction and teamwork. This approach can cater to social learners and foster a sense of community in the classroom.

3. Multiple Means of Expression

  • Varied Assessment Methods: Instead of relying solely on traditional tests, offer alternative assessment methods like presentations, portfolios, or creative projects. This allows students to demonstrate their understanding in ways that align with their strengths and preferences.
  • Technology Integration: Use technology tools such as blogging, digital storytelling, or video creation for students to express their learning. These tools can be particularly engaging for tech-savvy students.
  • Flexible Response Formats: Allow students to respond to questions or assignments in various formats, such as orally, in writing, or through art. This flexibility accommodates different expressive abilities and reduces barriers to demonstrating understanding.

Final thoughts

In conclusion, Universal Design for Learning (UDL) represents a significant shift in educational practices, focusing on inclusivity and personalized learning experiences. The main strength of UDL principles is that they allow us educators and teachers to create a learning environment that is adaptable, engaging, and supportive for every student.

This approach both benefits students with diverse learning styles and abilities and enriches the teaching experience, allowing educators to explore a range of innovative instructional strategies. Indeed, the real-world application of UDL principles prepares students for the challenges beyond the classroom, equipping them with the skills and knowledge necessary to navigate an increasingly diverse and complex world.

References

  • About Universal Design for Learning, CAST, accessed through https://www.cast.org/impact/universal-design-for-learning-udl
  • Courey, S. J., Tappe, P., Siker, J., & LePage, P. (2013). Improved lesson planning with Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406412446178
  • Dymond, S. K., Renzaglia, A., Rosenstein, A., Chun, E. J., Banks,R., Niswander, V., & Gilson, C. L. (2006). Using a participatory action research approach to create a universally designed inclusive high school science course: A case study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079690603100403
  • Evans, C., Williams, J. B., King, L., & Metcalf, D. (2010). Modeling, Guided Instruction, and Application of UDL in a Rural Special Education Teacher Preparation Program. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 29(4), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051002900409
  • Gargiulo, R. M., & Metcalf, D. J. (2023). Teaching in today’s inclusive classrooms : A universal design for learning approach (4th edition.). Cengage.
  • Higbee, J.L., & Goff, E. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and student services for institutional transformation: Implementing universal design in higher education. Minneapolis. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503835.pdf
  • Kortering, L., McCLannon, T., & Braziel, P. (2008). Universal design for learning: A look at what algebra and biology students with and without high incidence conditions are saying. Remedial & Special Education, 29(6),352-363.
  • Kurtts, S., Matthews, C., & Smallwood, T. (2009). (Dis)Solving the differences: A physical science lesson using universal design. Intervention in School & Clinic, 44(3), 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208326051
  • Meo, G. (2008). Curriculum planning for all learners: Applying universal design for learning (UDL) to a high school reading comprehension program. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.52.2.21-30
  • Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2000). Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Special
    Education Technology
    , 15 (1), 67-70.
  • Scott, S. S., McGuire, J. M., & Shaw, S. F. (2003). Universal Design for Instruction: A new paradigm for adult instruction in postsecondary education. Remedial and Special Education, 24(6), 369-379.
  • Scott, L., Bruno, L., Gokita., T., & Thoma, C. A. (2022). Teacher candidates’ abilities to develop universal design for learning and universal design for transition lesson plans. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(4), 333-347, DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2019.1651910
  • Silver, P., Bourke, A., & Strehorn, K. C. (1998). Universal Instructional Design in higher education: An approach for inclusion. Equity and Excellence in Education, 31(2), 47-51.
  • Van Laarhoven, T. R., Munk, D. D., Lynch, K., Bosma, J., & Rouse,J. (2007). A model for preparing special and general education preservice teachers for inclusive education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(5), 440-455.

The post What Is Universal Design for Learning ? appeared first on Educators Technology.

Research-based Benefits of Being Bilingual

Benefits of Being Bilingual

Language has always captivated me since childhood. The marvel of communicating through words, both spoken and unspoken, struck me as nothing short of magical. A question that often intrigued me was the origin of language. How did our early ancestors, be they Neanderthals or another race, develop this intricate system of shared conventions and meanings?

This topic, rich in history and analysis, spans centuries and countless volumes. While delving into its depths is a vast undertaking beyond the scope of this brief post, let’s acknowledge the remarkable fact that we’ve evolved complex communicative codes enabling us to interact meaningfully.

Another fascinating aspect of language is our ability to transcend the linguistic boundaries of our birth. Many of us are bilingual, trilingual, or even multilingual. In my years as an EFL teacher, I’ve witnessed the delight and challenge children experience in learning a new language.

This is no small feat; it’s a testament to the incredible capability of the human mind. Learning a new language opens a gateway to its underlying culture, offering insights into how others think and behave. This is a significant reason why bilingualism or multilingualism often leads to greater tolerance, coexistence, and acculturation, though this is not always the case.

The aim of this post is to shed light on the benefits of bilingualism. I draw from Mia Nacamulli’s enlightening TED Talk, “The Benefits of a Bilingual Brain”, summarizing key advantages and incorporating some into the accompanying visual. This can be a valuable resource for your students or children, helping them understand the myriad benefits of embracing a new language.

In addition to the insights from Mia Nacamulli’s TED Talk on the cognitive and cultural advantages of bilingualism, I delved deeper into the academic world to bring you a more comprehensive understanding of this fascinating topic. Bilingualism isn’t just about speaking two languages; it’s a complex and enriching experience that influences various aspects of our cognitive and social lives.

Related: 17 Best TED Ed Talks on Language Learning

To give you a broader perspective, I’ve explored several research papers that shed light on the multifaceted impacts of being bilingual. These studies offer intriguing findings – from enhanced executive control to potential protective effects against cognitive decline. But, as with any area of research, there are diverse viewpoints and findings, including some that challenge the conventional narrative of bilingualism’s benefits.

At the bottom of this post, you’ll find a selection of these research papers, offering you a gateway to explore the intriguing world of bilingualism further. Whether you’re a language enthusiast, a teacher, or just curious about the effects of bilingualism, these studies provide valuable insights into the ongoing conversation about the advantages and complexities of speaking more than one language.

The Benefits of Being Bilingual

According to Mia Nacamulli’ s TED Talk on Bilingual Brain, it’s clear that speaking more than one language offers a range of benefits. Here’s a summary of these advantages:

Benefits of Being Bilingual
  1. Cognitive Flexibility: Bilinguals can switch between languages, enhancing their problem-solving skills and adaptability.
  2. Improved Executive Function: Bilingualism strengthens the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which is crucial for executive functions like planning, decision-making, and task-switching.
  3. Enhanced Brain Health: Bilingual individuals often show higher density of grey matter in their brains. This aspect relates to the brain’s neurons and synapses, indicating a more robust neural network.
  4. Delayed Onset of Neurodegenerative Diseases: Regular use of multiple languages can delay the onset of diseases like Alzheimer’s and dementia by up to five years.
  5. Balanced Emotional Perspective: Those who learn a second language as adults may approach problems more rationally in their second language, exhibiting less emotional bias.
  6. Increased Brain Plasticity in Children: Kids learning languages can use both hemispheres of the brain for language acquisition, leading to a more holistic understanding of language’s social and emotional contexts.
  7. Cultural Awareness and Sensitivity: Knowing multiple languages often correlates with a deeper understanding and appreciation of different cultures.
  8. Practical Advantages: Bilingualism offers everyday benefits like easier travel and consuming media without subtitles.
  9. Linguistic and Conceptual Duality: Bilinguals, especially coordinate bilinguals, develop separate conceptual frameworks for each language, enriching their cognitive and cultural perspectives.
  10. Resilience in Language Processing: While bilinguals might initially have slower reaction times in language tests, the mental effort required to switch between languages strengthens their brain’s language processing abilities.

Besides Mia’ contribution, I scoured the research literature on bilingualism and summarized for you other findings. The following is a concise summary of key findings from various research studies, highlighting the multifaceted benefits that bilingualism can bring to cognitive functions and overall brain health.

  1. Enhanced Executive Control: Bilingual individuals often perform better in tasks requiring executive control, such as working memory, inhibition, and cognitive flexibility (Bialystok, 2011).
  2. Improved Coordination of Executive Functions: Bilingual children show better accuracy in complex tasks that involve coordinating executive control components, particularly under challenging conditions (Bialystok, 2011).
  3. Influences on Cognitive and Language Functioning: Bilingualism impacts language acquisition, nonverbal cognitive processing, and the brain networks involved in language processing and executive control (Bialystok et al., 2009).
  4. Superior Inhibitory Control in Auditory Comprehension: Bilinguals demonstrate a greater ability to suppress irrelevant information during auditory comprehension, indicating enhanced cognitive control (Blumenfeld & Marian, 2011).
  5. Aids in Conflict Resolution and Attentional Networks: Bilingualism enhances attentional networks, leading to faster and more efficient conflict resolution abilities and improved alerting and executive control (Costa, Hernández, Sebastián-Gallés, 2008).
  6. Protective Effect Against Cognitive Decline and Dementia: Bilingualism has a moderate protective effect on the age of onset of Alzheimer’s disease symptoms and contributes to cognitive reserve (Anderson, Hawrylewicz, Grundy, 2020).
  7. Positive Impact on Cognitive Aging: Bilinguals show better performance in later-life cognition, including general intelligence and reading, even for those who acquired a second language in adulthood (Bak, Nissan, Allerhand, Deary, 2014).
Benefits of Being Bilingual

Final thoughts

It’s fascinating to see how something as integral as language can have such a profound impact on our brain’s structure and function. As a former teacher and current educational researcher, these insights can be particularly valuable for understanding the benefits of promoting bilingual education. Encouraging language learning from a young age not only fosters cultural openness but also contributes significantly to cognitive development and long-term brain health.

Further readings

As we dive deeper into the fascinating world of bilingualism, let’s turn our attention to the scientific community’s contributions. The following section presents a curated selection of research studies that illuminate the diverse benefits and intriguing complexities of bilingualism. These papers provide a rich tapestry of evidence and perspectives, offering us a more rounded understanding of how speaking multiple languages can shape our minds and lives.

Bialystok, E. (2011) – “Reshaping the Mind: The Benefits of Bilingualism”

  • This study highlights that bilingual individuals often excel in tasks requiring executive control compared to monolinguals. It reviews evidence of how bilingualism influences cognitive organization and executive control structures. Additionally, the paper presents intriguing findings on bilingualism’s protective effect against Alzheimer’s disease, offering hypotheses for this protection.

Bialystok, E. (2011) – “Coordination of Executive Functions in Monolingual and Bilingual Children”

  • This research examines how bilingual and monolingual 8-year-olds perform in a complex classification task involving both visual and auditory stimuli. The task assesses executive control components like working memory, inhibition, and shifting. Findings show that bilingual children, especially in visual tasks, maintain better accuracy under more challenging dual-task conditions, suggesting enhanced coordination of executive functions.

Bialystok, E., Craik, F.I.M., Green, D.W., Gollan, T.H. (2009) – “Bilingual Minds”

  • This comprehensive paper discusses the broad impact of bilingualism on language and cognitive functioning. It covers four areas: differences in language acquisition and processing between monolinguals and bilinguals, bilingualism’s influence on nonverbal cognitive processing, the brain networks involved in bilingual language processing and their role in executive control, and the implications of bilingualism in clinical assessments and interventions. The paper also touches on public policy implications related to multilingual education and healthcare for bilingual individuals.

Blumenfeld, H.K., Marian, V. (2011) – “Bilingualism Influences Inhibitory Control in Auditory Comprehension”

  • This study investigates how bilinguals demonstrate superior ability to suppress irrelevant information during auditory comprehension. Using eye-tracking, the research compares monolinguals and bilinguals listening to words in English and identifies them among pictures. While both groups showed similar competition in language processing, bilinguals differed in their use of inhibitory control, as evidenced by their performance on nonlinguistic tasks like the Stroop test. This suggests that bilingualism shapes cognitive control mechanisms through linguistic experience.

Costa, A., Hernández, M., Sebastián-Gallés. (2008) – “Bilingualism Aids Conflict Resolution”

  • This research explores how bilinguals’ need to control two languages might enhance their attentional networks. Comparing bilinguals and monolinguals using the Attentional Network Task (ANT), the study finds that bilinguals are faster and more efficient, particularly in the alerting and executive control networks. Bilinguals showed improved conflict resolution abilities and reduced switching costs, indicating that bilingualism positively influences the development of efficient attentional mechanisms.

Anderson, J.A.E., Hawrylewicz, K., Grundy, J.G. (2020) – “Does Bilingualism Protect Against Dementia?”

  • This meta-analysis examines the role of bilingualism in protecting against cognitive decline and dementia. The study differentiates between the incidence rates of dementia and the age of symptom onset. The results indicate a moderate protective effect of bilingualism on the age of onset of Alzheimer’s disease symptoms and a weaker effect on preventing the disease incidence. The findings also dismiss confounding factors like socioeconomic status, education, or publication bias, contributing to the understanding of bilingualism’s role in cognitive reserve.

Bak, T.H., Nissan, J.J., Allerhand, M.M., Deary, I.J. (2014) – “Does Bilingualism Influence Cognitive Aging?”

  • This study assesses the impact of bilingualism on cognitive aging, controlling for childhood intelligence. It tracks participants first tested in 1947 and retested in 2008–2010. Findings show that bilinguals performed better than predicted from their baseline cognitive abilities, particularly in general intelligence and reading. The research suggests that bilingualism has a positive effect on cognition in later life, including for those who acquired a second language in adulthood.

de Bruin, A., Treccani, B., Della Sala, S. (2015) – “Cognitive Advantage in Bilingualism: An Example of Publication Bias?”

  • This study challenges the widely accepted notion of a cognitive advantage in bilinguals over monolinguals in executive-control tasks. Investigating a potential publication bias, the researchers analyzed conference abstracts from 1999 to 2012 related to bilingualism and executive control. They tracked which studies were eventually published and found that those fully supporting the bilingual advantage theory were most likely to be published, followed by studies with mixed results. In contrast, studies that contradicted the bilingual advantage were least likely to be published. This trend was observed despite no significant differences in sample size, tests used, or statistical power among the studies. Additionally, a funnel-plot asymmetry test indicated the presence of a publication bias. This research suggests that the perceived cognitive benefits of bilingualism might be influenced by the selective publication of positive results, highlighting the need for a more balanced and comprehensive examination of bilingualism’s impact on cognition.

References

The post Research-based Benefits of Being Bilingual appeared first on Educators Technology.

30 Effective Classroom Attention Getters with Examples


In the dynamic world of education, keeping students engaged and attentive is a challenge every educator faces. Classrooms, the breeding grounds for future thinkers and innovators, can sometimes become arenas of boredom and disengagement. Boredom, as Vogel-Walcutt et al. (2012) stated, “occurs when an individual experiences both the (objective) neurological state of low arousal and the (subjective) psychological state of dissatisfaction, frustration, or disinterest in response to the low arousal” (p. 102). This state of boredom is not just an occasional inconvenience; it is a significant barrier to effective learning.

Research has consistently highlighted the detrimental effects of boredom on student learning. For instance, Wallace, Vodanovich, and Restino (2003) discussed how boredom correlates with attention deficit and memory lapses, signaling a deeper issue than mere disinterest. Furthermore, Pekrun et al. (2010) linked boredom to attentional problems in class, while Maroldo (1986) noted its association with lower GPAs and a decreased motivation to learn. This paints a clear picture: boredom is a multifaceted issue impacting various aspects of a student’s academic journey.

Recognizing the gravity of this challenge, educators have sought effective strategies to combat classroom boredom. Rosegard & Olson (2013) suggest that one effective approach is to increase arousal through external stimuli such as “a hook, trigger, attention getter/grabber, or anticipatory set” (p. 2). These methods are not mere distractions but are thoughtfully designed to ignite students’ curiosity and pull them into the heart of the learning experience. The goal is to transform passive listeners into active participants, engaged and intrigued by the material presented.

The purpose of this post is to share with you a wide range of practical strategies (attention getters or attention grabbers) to help keep your students focused and engaged. But before we explore these strategies, let us first a key concept which is at the core of students attention: Interest.

Situational Vs Personal/Individual Interest

At the core of any attention grabbing task in class lies the concept of interest. Interest is the catalyst that transforms mundane topics into captivating subjects. But what exactly is interest, and how does it function in an educational setting?

Interest, as Chen et al. () define it, is “a positive psychological state that is based on or emerges from person-activity interaction” (p. 384). Krapp, Hidi, and Renninger (1992) further categorize interest into two main categories: personal or individual interest and situational interest.

Situational interest, according to Chen et al. (), is ” the appealing effect of an activity or learning task on an individual, rather than the individual’s personal preference for the activity” (p. 384). Situational interest is interactional in nature. It is generated through the learner’s interaction with the learning task at hand and as, Chen et al state, results from “students recognition of the appeaking features associated with a specific learning task” (p. 384).

Personal/individual interest, according to the same authors, is “a person’s preference for one activity over others. It is developed over time through a person’s constant and consistent interaction with the activity” (p. 384).

But why does situational interest matter?

Situational interest plays a crucial role in the classroom as it acts as an immediate, emotional response that sparks curiosity or excitement in students about a specific topic or activity. This kind of interest is akin to a momentary flame that catches students’ attention, enhancing their focus and participation in the learning process (Rosegard & Olson, 2013).

Unlike individual interest, which develops slowly and is more enduring, situational interest is a powerful and immediate tool for educators to captivate students’ attention, thereby improving engagement and participation in educational activities (Hidi et al., 2004; Deci, 1992; Renninger et al., 1992).


Classroom Attention Getters

Classroom Attention Getters

Here are some practical attention grabbers/ attention getters to use in your class to keep students engaged and focused:

1. Use Humour

Humour is a powerful tool in the classroom, engaging students and creating a positive learning environment (for a review of importance of humour in teaching see Martin, 2007; Rosegard & Olson, 2013; Wanzer et al., 2010; Ziv, 1988). By incorporating jokes, funny anecdotes, or light-hearted content, teachers can capture students’ attention and make lessons more memorable. For instance, starting a history lesson with a humorous story about a historical figure can pique students’ curiosity and make the topic more relatable.

2. Use of Multimedia

Multimedia integrates various forms of media, like videos, animations, and interactive content, to enrich the learning experience. This approach appeals to different learning styles and keeps students engaged (Mayer, 2003). For example, in a science class, an animated video explaining the solar system can make the concept more tangible and visually stimulating compared to traditional textbook descriptions.

3. Offer Choices

Offering choices in learning activities empowers students and fosters engagement. When students have a say in their learning process, they feel more invested. An example could be allowing students to choose between creating a poster, writing an essay, or making a presentation for a project. This autonomy caters to different strengths and interests.

4. Change Voice Pitch

Altering voice pitch and tone can be an effective way to maintain student attention. A varied vocal delivery prevents monotony and keeps students alert. For instance, a teacher might use a lower pitch to emphasize important points and a higher, enthusiastic tone for storytelling or explanations, helping to highlight key information and maintain engagement.

5. Use Technology

Incorporating technology, such as educational apps, interactive whiteboards, or online quizzes, can enhance learning and engagement. It caters to the digital natives in the classroom. For example, using a quiz app (e.g., Quizlet, Kahoot, Quizalize, etc) for a quick classroom competition allows for immediate feedback and adds a fun, interactive element to the lesson.

6. Use Music

Music can set the mood, energize the classroom, and aid in learning. It can be used to introduce a new topic, signal transitions, or support memory. For example, playing a relevant song at the beginning of a literature class discussing that era’s culture can immediately engage students and set the context for the lesson.


7. Personalized Intervention

Personalized intervention involves tailoring teaching methods and content to meet individual student needs. This approach recognizes that each student learns differently. A teacher might use this strategy by offering different reading materials at varying difficulty levels, ensuring each student is challenged appropriately.

8. Call and Response

Call and response is an interactive technique where the teacher says a phrase and students respond in unison. This method keeps students attentive and active in the learning process. For example, in a language class, the teacher might say a word in a foreign language, and students respond with the translation, reinforcing learning through repetition and engagement.

9. Sing It

Turning lessons into songs or incorporating music into teaching, as we have seen, can make learning more enjoyable and memorable. This method is particularly effective for memorization. In a math class, for instance, a teacher could create a catchy song to help students remember the order of operations.

10. Integrate Games

Games in education, whether digital or physical, can transform learning into an engaging, competitive experience. They encourage participation and can be used to reinforce concepts. An example is using a jeopardy-style game to review for a test, where students compete in teams to answer questions related to the subject matter, fostering both teamwork and knowledge retention.

11. Use Tongue Twisters

Tongue twisters are a fun and challenging way to grab students’ attention and improve their pronunciation and focus. For instance, starting a language class with a tongue twister related to the day’s lesson can energize students and sharpen their listening and speaking skills. It’s a playful approach that breaks the ice and increases alertness.

12. Try Unexpected Things

Introducing unexpected elements or activities in class can spark curiosity and hold students’ attention. This could be as simple as incorporating a surprising fact into a lesson or conducting a class outdoors. For example, teaching a biology lesson in the school garden can provide a refreshing change and make the learning experience more tangible and engaging.

13. Modify the Setting

Changing the physical layout or environment of the classroom can stimulate interest and engagement. Rearranging desks, decorating the room according to a theme, or even holding a class in a different location can make the learning experience fresh and exciting. For example, setting up a mock courtroom for a social studies lesson on government can bring the subject to life.

14. Bring Guests

Inviting guest speakers or experts can provide a new perspective and enliven the classroom experience. Guests can share real-world experiences, offer expertise, and make the learning more relevant. For example, inviting a local author to a literature class can offer insights into the writing process and inspire students.

15. Reward for Attention

Implementing a reward system for attentive and engaged behavior can motivate students. This could be in the form of points, privileges, or small prizes. For example, offering extra playtime or a homework pass to the most engaged group in a class project can incentivize students to participate actively.

16. Engage students Kinaesthetically

Kinaesthetic activities involve movement and physical activity, catering to learners who thrive on action. This can mean incorporating hands-on experiments, role-playing, or movement-based learning. For instance, in a geometry lesson, students could physically create shapes using ropes, helping them understand concepts through movement.

17. Use Timers

Timers can add a sense of urgency and excitement to tasks. They can be used to manage time for activities, games, or transitions between different parts of the lesson. For example, setting a timer for a quick brainstorming session can make the activity more dynamic and focus students’ efforts.

18. Ask Comprehension Check Questions

Periodically asking questions to check understanding keeps students on their toes and ensures active listening. These can be quick, informal questions related to the lesson’s content. In a history class, asking students to explain the significance of an event just discussed not only checks comprehension but also encourages them to articulate their understanding.

19. Incorporate Storytelling

Storytelling is a timeless technique that can captivate students’ attention. By weaving educational content into stories, or using narratives to introduce new topics, teachers can make lessons more engaging and relatable. For instance, explaining a scientific concept through a story about its discovery or application can help students visualize and better understand complex ideas.

20. Use Real-World Examples

Connecting classroom learning to real-world scenarios makes education more relevant and interesting. Discussing how theoretical knowledge is applied in everyday life or in various professions can stimulate curiosity. For example, in a math class, showing how algebra is used in architecture can provide a practical context and enhance engagement.

21. Create Mystery and Suspense

Building a sense of mystery or suspense in the classroom can be incredibly engaging. This could involve starting a lesson with a puzzling question, setting up a mystery for students to solve, or using a suspenseful narrative to unfold new topics. For instance, introducing a science lesson with a mysterious phenomenon that students have to explain using the day’s lesson can pique interest.

22. Utilize Student-Led Learning

Allowing students to take the lead in certain classroom activities empowers them and fosters a deeper level of engagement. This can involve students teaching a portion of the lesson, leading a discussion, or presenting their projects. For example, in a history class, students could be assigned to research and present different aspects of a historical event, encouraging active participation and peer learning.

23. Incorporate Role-Playing

Role-playing allows students to immerse themselves in a topic by acting out scenarios or historical events. This active participation can make learning more memorable and enjoyable. For example, in a social studies class, students could role-play as delegates from different countries in a model United Nations, helping them understand international relations and diplomacy through experience.

24. Conduct Debates

Organizing debates on relevant topics encourages critical thinking and active engagement. Students learn to research, formulate arguments, and consider different viewpoints. For example, a debate in a social studies class on a current political issue can deepen understanding and encourage students to engage with the material actively.

25. Implement Collaborative Projects

Collaborative projects involve students working together towards a common goal, fostering teamwork and engagement. This approach allows students to learn from each other and develop social skills. An example could be a group science project where each student contributes to building a model ecosystem, encouraging cooperation and hands-on learning.

26. Use Visual Aids

Visual aids like charts, graphs, and images can make abstract concepts more concrete and engaging. They appeal to visual learners and can help clarify complex information. In a geography class, using a large, detailed map to discuss geographical features and locations can make the lesson more interactive and understandable.

27. Encourage Peer Teaching

Peer teaching involves students teaching each other, reinforcing their own understanding while helping others. This method promotes active learning and builds communication skills. For instance, in a math class, students who grasp a concept quickly can be paired with those who need more help, facilitating mutual learning.

28. Integrate Field Trips

Field trips extend learning beyond the classroom, providing real-world experiences and a change of scenery that can reinvigorate student interest. Whether it’s a visit to a museum, a historical site, or a local business, these outings make learning more tangible and memorable. For example, a trip to a local science center can enhance a unit on physics by providing hands-on experiences with scientific principles.

29. Facilitate Reflection Sessions

Reflection sessions give students the opportunity to think about what they’ve learned, how they’ve learned it, and what it means to them. This introspective approach can deepen understanding and encourage personal connection to the material. For example, at the end of a unit, having a class discussion where students share their thoughts on the key learnings and how these might apply to their lives can be very impactful.

30. Use Puzzles and Brain Teasers

Incorporating puzzles and brain teasers into the classroom can sharpen critical thinking and problem-solving skills while capturing students’ attention. These activities can be used as warm-ups or to introduce new concepts in a fun and challenging way. For instance, starting a math class with a logic puzzle that indirectly introduces the day’s topic can engage students’ minds and set the tone for the lesson.

This visual is available for free download for Educators Technology subscribers. Subscribe to get your free download link.


classroom attention getters

Final thoughts

In conclusion, combating boredom and disengagement in the classroom requires a multifaceted approach, one that is both creative and responsive to the diverse needs of students. The attention grabbing strategies outlined in this post, ranging from using humor and multimedia to facilitating reflection sessions and brain teasers, are not just tools to keep students attentive; they are catalysts for a deeper, more meaningful engagement with learning.

Each attention getter, underpinned by the principles of situational interest, offers a unique way to ignite students’ curiosity and participation. By integrating these approaches, educators can create a dynamic and inclusive learning environment where every student has the opportunity to thrive.

References

  • Berk, R. A. (2011). Research on PowerPoint: From basic features to multimedia. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 24-35
  • Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43-69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Associates.
  • Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternburg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89– 114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 1-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Maroldo, G. K. (1986). Shyness, boredom, and grade point average among college students. Psychological Reports, 59(2), 395–398. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1986.59.2.395
  • Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00016-6
  • Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019243
  • Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (Eds.) (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Rosegard, E. & Wilson, J. (2013). Capturing students’ attention: An empirical study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13 (5), 1–20. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1017063.pdf
  • Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., Fiorella, L., Carper, T., & Schatz, S. (2012). The definition, assessment, and mitigation of state boredom within educational settings: A comprehensive review. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 89-111.
  • Wallace, J. C., Vodanovich, S. J., & Restino, B. M. (2003). Predicting cognitive failures from boredom proneness and daytime sleepiness scores: An investigation within military and undergraduate samples. Personality & Individual Differences, 34(4), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00050-8
  • Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B., & Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instruction humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903367238
  • Ziv, A. (1988). Teaching and learning with humor: Experiment and replication. Journal of Experimental Education, 57(1), 5-15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20151750

The post 30 Effective Classroom Attention Getters with Examples appeared first on Educators Technology.

18 Effective Classroom Motivation Strategies

Motivation is one of the key concept in psychology. It is mainly concerned with the why and how humans think and behave as they do. Its significance is particularly pronounced in the realm of classroom learning, where it’s often invoked to explain the successes and failures in learning processes.

Research proved time and again that well-designed curricula and effective teaching methods are not enough to drive students motivation. It takes an integrated and holistic approach that considers both intrinsic and extrinsic factors to enhance students motivation and drive their engagement (Dôrnyei, 2005).

So what are some of these classroom strategies that drive students motivation?

Before we delve into these strategies let clarify something here: when we talk about motivation strategies we need to differentiate between instructional interventions and self-regulating strategies. Instructional interventions as XXX state are “applied by the teacher to elicit and stimulate student motivation”, and self-regulating strategies “are used purposefully by individual students to manage the level of their own motivation” (p. 57)

In this post I am primarily concerned with instructional interventions, that is, those strategies, you as a teacher and educator can use in your teaching practice to drive students motivation and enhance their engagement.


Related: Great Motivational Videos for Students


Aspects of Motivation

In his paper “Student Motivation and the Alignment of Teacher Beliefs“, Weisman (2012) provides an insightful overview of different aspects of motivation in the educational context. Two aspects are of particular interest to us in this context: intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.

Intrinsic motivation, a key component in learning, is driven by a natural curiosity and an inherent interest in a subject. This form of motivation manifests in two distinct ways: individual interest, where a child’s innate desire to learn plays a central role, and situational interest, spurred by environmental factors that pique one’s curiosity.

On the other hand, extrinsic motivation revolves around external rewards. However, as Weisman contends, the impact of these rewards is nuanced. While certain types of verbal rewards might bolster intrinsic motivation, most external rewards, particularly tangible or performance-based ones, can paradoxically undermine it. This highlights the delicate balance between internal drive and external incentives in the context of motivation.

Teacher Practices That Enhance Student Motivation

In the insightful work of Weisman (2012), several key practices are identified that significantly enhance student motivation. These practices include:

  • Creating Caring Environments: Positive student-teacher relationships are crucial.
  • Empathy and Understanding: Understanding students’ lives and affirming their interests can significantly influence motivation.
  • Providing Choice and Responsibility: Letting students make choices about their learning enhances motivation.
  • Hands-On Activities: Encouraging investigative or experiential learning activities helps in knowledge construction.

Classroom Motivation Strategies


Classroom Motivation Strategies

Drawing upon the insightful work of Guilloteaux & Dörnyei (2008), specifically from pages 63-64, this section delves into a variety of motivational strategies, enriched with my own examples and explanations to illustrate their practical application in educational settings. These strategies, which range from tangible rewards to fostering a competitive yet collaborative classroom atmosphere, are pivotal in enhancing student engagement and motivation, offering a dynamic and effective approach to teaching and learning.

1. Pair Work

  • Explanation: Pair work involves two students collaborating on a task. This approach is beneficial as it allows for peer-to-peer interaction, sharing of ideas, and mutual support.
  • Example: In a language class, students might work in pairs to practice a new set of vocabulary words. Each student takes turns using a word in a sentence, while the other offers feedback or suggests improvements.

2. Group Work

  • Explanation: Group work requires students to collaborate in small teams. This fosters a sense of community, encourages diverse perspectives, and develops teamwork skills.
  • Example: In a science class, students could work in groups to conduct an experiment. Each member could have a specific role (like note-taker, experimenter, or analyst) to contribute to the group’s overall success.

3. Play Games in Class

  • Explanation: Incorporating games into learning can make the process more enjoyable and engaging. Games stimulate competition and cooperation, making learning more dynamic.
  • Example: A math teacher might use a game like ‘Bingo’ to reinforce multiplication skills. Each correct answer allows a student to mark a spot on their Bingo card.

4. Students Self-Evaluate

  • Explanation: Self-evaluation empowers students to assess their own learning. This encourages reflection, self-awareness, and responsibility for their learning process.
  • Example: After completing a writing assignment, students could use a checklist to evaluate their work for elements like grammar, structure, and content clarity.

5. Students Co-Evaluate

  • Explanation: Co-evaluation, or peer review, involves students evaluating each other’s work. This method provides different perspectives and can foster a collaborative learning environment.
  • Example: In a history class, students might peer-review each other’s essays, offering constructive feedback on arguments, evidence used, and clarity of writing.

6. Scaffolding

  • Explanation: Scaffolding is a teaching method that involves providing students with temporary support until they can perform tasks independently. This approach is tailored to the student’s current level of understanding.
  • Example: In learning a complex concept like fractions, a teacher might start with concrete examples using physical objects, gradually moving to more abstract representations as students’ understanding deepens.

7. Arousing Curiosity or Attention

  • Explanation: This strategy involves sparking students’ interest at the beginning of an activity. By arousing curiosity, you engage students and make the learning process more intriguing.
  • Example: In a geography lesson, the teacher might start by showing a mysterious image of a place and asking students to guess where it could be, hinting at the unique characteristics of that location.

8. Establishing Relevance

  • Explanation: Making a direct connection between what’s being learned and the students’ everyday lives helps them understand the practical application of knowledge.
  • Example: In a mathematics class, a teacher could explain how algebra is used in calculating discounts during shopping, thus linking the lesson to a common real-life scenario.

9. Signposting

  • Explanation: Clearly stating lesson objectives or summarizing progress helps students understand the purpose of the lesson and how it fits into the larger curriculum.
  • Example: At the start of a history lesson, the teacher might say, “Today, we’re going to learn about the causes of World War I, which will help us understand current global political dynamics.”

10. Social Chat

  • Explanation: Engaging in informal conversation on topics unrelated to the lesson can build rapport, make the classroom environment more relaxed and approachable.
  • Example: A teacher might start a class with a brief chat about a popular sporting event or a new movie, creating a friendly atmosphere.

11. Promoting Autonomy

  • Explanation: Allowing students to make choices and take part in decision-making fosters independence and makes learning more personally engaging.
  • Example: In a language arts class, students could be given the choice to select a book for a book report. Alternatively, they might decide how to present their project, whether through a traditional report, a creative video, or a class presentation.

12. Tangible Reward

  • Explanation: Offering physical rewards for participation or successful completion of an activity can serve as a direct motivator, especially for younger students.
  • Example: A teacher might give stickers or small treats to students who complete their math homework on time.

13. Personalization

  • Explanation: Allowing students to incorporate their personal experiences, feelings, or opinions into their work makes learning more relevant and engaging for them.
  • Example: In an English class, students could write essays based on their own life experiences or opinions on a topic, thus making the assignment more personally meaningful.

14. Tangible Task Product

  • Explanation: Having students create a physical product as a part of their learning process can enhance engagement and provide a sense of accomplishment.
  • Example: In a science class, students could create a model of a solar system, or in art, they might design a brochure for an exhibition.

15. Individual Competition

  • Explanation: Activities that include elements of individual competition can motivate students to perform better by tapping into their competitive spirit.
  • Example: A math quiz where students compete to solve problems the fastest can encourage individual effort and focus.

16. Team Competition

  • Explanation: Involving an element of team competition can build teamwork and collaborative skills, while still leveraging the motivational benefits of competition.
  • Example: A history trivia game where students work in teams to answer questions can foster both cooperation and a competitive drive.

17. Effective Praise

  • Explanation: Giving praise that is sincere, specific, and commensurate with the student’s achievement can boost confidence and reinforce positive behavior.
  • Example: Instead of just saying “Good job!”, a teacher might say, “I’m impressed with how you used evidence to support your argument in that essay.”

18. Class Applause

  • Explanation: Celebrating a student’s or a group’s effort or success through applause can create a positive and supportive classroom environment.
  • Example: After a student presents a well-researched project, the teacher could lead the class in applauding their effort and achievement.

Classroom motivation strategies poster is available for free download in PDF formats. Subscribe to download it.


Classroom Motivation Strategies

Final thoughts

In conclusion, the exploration of effective classroom strategies underscores the multifaceted nature of motivation in educational settings. Indeed, the insights provided by educational researchers like Dôrnyei and Weisman offer valuable guidance for teachers in creating a learning environment that not only educates but also inspires and motivates.

By integrating these strategies into everyday teaching practices, educators can ignite a passion for learning, cultivate a supportive classroom atmosphere, and ultimately enhance the educational journey for their students. This holistic approach to motivation in the classroom is not just about academic achievement; it’s about nurturing lifelong learners who are curious, confident, and motivated to explore the world around them.

References

  • Bernaus, M., & Gardner, R. C. (2008). Teacher Motivation Strategies, Student Perceptions, Student Motivation, and English Achievement. The Modern Language Journal, 92(3), 387–401. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25173065
  • Guilloteaux, M. J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating Language Learners: A Classroom-Oriented Investigation of the Effects of Motivational Strategies on Student Motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), 55–77. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40264425
  • WIESMAN, J. (2012). Student Motivation and the Alignment of Teacher Beliefs. The Clearing House, 85(3), 102–108. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23212853

The post 18 Effective Classroom Motivation Strategies appeared first on Educators Technology.